<![CDATA[Typography for Everyone - Blog]]>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:19:48 -0400Weebly<![CDATA[Who Really Designed Times New Roman?]]>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:26:28 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/who-really-designed-times-new-roman
This is sample of the Starling font as sold by the Font Bureau of Cambridge. The Roman (and Bold) members of the family resemble Monotype's Times New Roman fairly closely, but the Italics seem to have more life to them.

There is an alternate story for the origin of Monotype’s Times New Roman. Like many old stories it has proven difficult to verify. The dubious path winds circuitously through the shipyards of an American yacht designer in Marblehead, MA, named William Starling Burgess. He was a multitalented designer of experimental aircraft, racing yachts, and the Dymaxion automobile.

At some point he had an association with the American Lanston Monotype Company and had begun at least one typeface design for them. This was around 1904, but by 1910, he had gone into business with the Wright Brothers and was designing airplanes for them. So, as the story goes, Burgess returned the drawings to Monotype. At some point, they were forwarded to Stanley Morrison who, as you recall from the previous blog, had started his redesign of a new font for use by the London Times. The font created from the Burgess drawings is sold today under the name of “Starling.” and looks strikingly like Times New Roman.

The drawings no longer exist. Neither does any correspondence from Burgess, supposedly requesting that the font be used for his yacht company for internal documents. Let the record show that the Monotype Corporation lost some files in a bombing raid during WW2 in London, and both Monotype's offices in Canada and Burgess's facility in Marblehead were flooded at various times. There could also have been correspondence to or from the American Monotype company, owned most recently by Gerald Giampa. It was likely he who passed on the Burgess drawings to Mike Parker — are you still following this??— who had been the Director of Typography for the Merganthaler Linotype Company during their conversion from metal to phototype through the 1980s. Parker went on to co-found Bitstream, the first digital type foundry. It was Mike Parker who created The Starling font in its digital format for the Font Bureau of Cambridge. 

Parker started the story of Burgess’s authorship of the typeface as the original Times New Roman at a type conference in 1994. Was it true or false? Having met Mike Parker on a couple of occasions, at least once when he was still at Merganthaler, I recall him as a rather garrulous individual and quite a raconteur. I can easily picture him starting a mythical story about the origins of Times New Roman. 

Going back over the facts from my last blog entry, it makes sense that Stanley Morrison didn’t draw the fonts as he wasn’t a designer himself. And his associate, Victor Lardent wasn’t a true type designer, either, but a lettering artist for Monotype. As I mentioned previously, it makes sense that Morrison was perfectly capable of art directing Lardent’s work, whatever the source. In addition, when I looked up Times New Roman in MyFonts.com, William Starling Burgess is listed as the designer. It should be noted that MyFonts was started by Bitstream, Mike Parker’s company. 

The following is from Font Bureau’s description of the Starling family on their web site: 
     “In 1904 William Starling Burgess, Boston racing sailor, designed his second type.
     Six years later, now the Wright Brothers’ partner, Starling quit type, returning
     the drawings to Monotype. Frank Pierpont collected the nameless roman for
     British Monotype, passing it to Stanley Morison in 1932 for The London Times.
     Mike Parker found the original superior, and prepared this Starling series for
​     Font Bureau, who found it to be ‘the right stuff’.” — Font Bureau, 2009

You can read more of the convoluted story on Luc DeVroye’s site:
​                 http://luc.devroye.org/fonts-24415.html

<![CDATA[Times Roman or Times New Roman]]>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 18:56:30 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/times-roman-or-times-new-roman

​This is an expanded version of what I recently posted in my newsletter.

It's the saga of what I used to call the world’s most boring typeface: Times Roman. I called it boring because Times was ubiquitous. For a while it was the default font for Microsoft Word as well as the required font for college papers and technical documents in industry. I personally worked on various versions of this font about 6 times for two different phototypesetting companies and the actual digital versions you use on your computers today—both Times Roman and Times New Roman. You have undoubtedly used them and probably take them for granted now, so here’s the common story behind the two Times fonts, which usually goes something like this:
The original typeface used by the British newspaper, The (London) Times (founded in 1785), wasn’t officially named "Times," but was referred to as “the Times font,” or “the typeface used by The Times.” In 1931, The Times of London commissioned a new text type design from Stanley Morison and the Monotype Corporation. This was a couple years after Morison had written an article criticizing The Times for being badly printed and typographically behind the times (sic). The Times had been using a “modern” type for the previous 100 years, but by the 1920s, it appeared rather outdated, according to Morison. The overall look and feel of The Times was a good example of type having a “voice”—in this case, it looked like what people expected from a newspaper. It was similar to many types used during the 19th Century.

PictureThis is a sample of a typical "modern" or :"Didone" typeface used for books and newspapers during the 1800s.
 This is what a typical newspaper or book typeface looked like in the 1800s. Imagine what a high-speed press and cheap paper would do to this "delicate" design. The new design was supervised by Morison, who was at that time a well-known typographic consultant to The Times (and for the Monotype Typesetter Company), and drawn by Victor Lardent, an artist from the advertising department of the newspaper. This seems likely, since Stanley Morison was not a designer, but as a critic and astute editor, he could certainly indicate what portions of the letterforms required change. The redesign lasted two years and the first newspaper edition with the new types appeared in December of 1932. The general design of the new new font was better suited to the high-speed rotary presses [see above] used for newspaper production. My impressions of Times Roman were that, as we see it presented now, it wasn’t suitable for newspaper production. When I was introduced to it early in my career as a designer, it was very popular as a book and magazine typeface. You could hardly pick up a book in the second half of the 20th Century that wasn’t set in Times. Actually, Times Roman was offered for commercial sale starting in 1932 but few American newspapers used it. What had become the standard then were the new types from the enormously popular Legibility Series manufactured by Linotype. 

This is Exselcior, a from Linotype's Legibility Group developed in the 1920s. Notice the similarities to the Modern example shown above.

The first of this series was called Ionic and looked very much like Century Schoolbook. Others followed, such as Excelsior and Textype and even Corona (!). Many newspapers are still using these fonts or variations of them. Why did it take so long to long to develop these new fonts? One reason has to do with aesthetics. Any new typeface, even today, needs to go through a series of editing cycles to determine if the design will actually fulfill its intended purpose. What looks good on pencil and paper may not pass muster when it comes to looking good in print. In the case of the Times New Roman font, there were experiments going on simultaneously. Two other Monotype fonts were being modified and tested at the same time: one was Eric Gill’s Perpetua. The other was Plantin, which was a stately old Dutch design that looks quite similar to Times, but just a little heavier. It’s still used today in many British publications. There was another other reason didn’t occur to me for a while, even as a seasoned type designer. Back in the era when type manufacturing companies were producing “new” fonts for their customers, the designers were tasked with determining the best design size and proportions to use. The 10 point a, b, or c you see on your computer monitor now, looks essentially like the exact same design when enlarged to 24 point. When type was “cut” and

The “and"s in black are actual Times Roman printed samples scaled to the same size. The one in magenta is the digital font reduced to match the 9 and 10 point samples. Try and see the design differences between them. They are created to be legible at the smaller sizes that newspapers use.

molded from metal there were subtle proportion changes necessary to maintain legibility from 10 point size to 72 point sizes. It’s very possible that you wouldn’t recognize a line of 7, 8, or 9 point Times Roman (printed in 1932) as being the same design as a 24 point headline sample from the same typeface. Or maybe you would. The samples above are more recognizable than I anticipated, but you can see that the thin portions are actually designed heavier for better legibility at the reading sizes. The digital font has software instructions called “hints” the ensure that the thin portions (called hairlines) do not disappear on the computer screen at the smaller sizes now.  Designing a new type in 1932, meant creating a 9 point alphabet (the size at which it would be used in the newspaper) and probably 8 and 10 point, as well. The resulting design and printed copy would then need to be compared to the existing 8, 9, and 10 point designs for corresponding legibility and quality. No quick or easy task. Any changes deemed necessary, would require another alphabet to be cut. Compare this to making changes to vector shapes today in a program like Adobe Illustrator. You’re talking about days now verses weeks or months back then. So you can see why you cannot exactly rush a brand new design to market in 1932. Especially if the product in question has to be reviewed by a committee.

​The Times “New Roman” fonts did make it to print and the London Times did get a new look. Was it earth-shaking? Perhaps not, but it did receive a generally good reception. The Times and Monotype did release the new deign for commercial sale a year later for the American Linotype Company. It was not a rousing success with US newspapers but by the end of World War 2 (the mid 1940s) it had found a comfortable market in book publishing.

[I suppose this part may sound like “piracy,” but before the advent of true digital outline font technology, if you were a printing company that needed to set type, you would purchase a photo typesetting device from companies such as Compugraphic or Itek (two companies I worked for) but it was also necessary to purchase compatible fonts for those machines. Our customers wanted Times Roman and Helvetica or something that looked like them. So, we as designers created “similar to” versions of these fonts.]

And now, the rest of the story: Qui Bene? or, Follow the money. This is a short version of a longer story. In 1985, Steve Jobs started selling his Apple Laser Writer printer with 35 scalable PostScript® fonts. The “advantage” had been the bitmapped fonts that were part of the original Macintosh operating system. Not high quality, but they were better than the dot matrix fonts that you saw on your cash register receipt from Walmart, Walgreen's or your gas station. These new fonts were genuine scalable PostScript® fonts from our old friend Linotype, which was getting out of the typesetting machine (photo and digital, by now) business and concentrating on the digital fonts from their library going back to the 1920s—fonts that professional typographers and printers used. This was a big plus for Apple. But it wasn’t long before Bill Gates and Microsoft decided they wanted to cash in on this growing and very profitable side of the graphic arts and printing business. The story gets a little peculiar at this point. Microsoft was, at that time, developing a new operating system called Windows (3.1 to be exact). It was going to ship with scalable fonts called TrueType® that didn’t need a specially equipped printer, as did the Postscript technology. The interesting part was that the TrueType fonts were a joint venture with . . . Apple. The fonts being shipped were the same fonts that Apple was packaging —except they were from Monotype, which was now in the font business, too. Linotype still had rights to Times Roman and Monotype had the rights to—you guessed it—Times New Roman. The benefit was to Microsoft because, in a sense, they had the original Times New Roman and paid royalties to Monotype, through a re-negotiated contract. Other fonts, such as Bookman, are also licensed to Monotype. Apple paid their font royalties to Linotype, so I assume everyone is happy.

Well, that’s most of the story. There are a few more details in this blog post. But Times and Times New Roman are now available to virtually everyone and remain quite popular. If you are interested in the design differences between the two different families, there are charts and samples readily available online. A quick Google search will give you everything you want and probably more.  If you want to make your own character-by-character chart, Just type out an alphabet line of the lower case italic for both TNR and TR and look at the lower case z. Next compare the figure 5 in the Roman (or Regular} versions. Definitely different but not a deal breaker for most (like 99.9%) of all users. As mentioned, they’re the same but different. And now you know most of the story.

​And yes, there is more. This part is rather unusual, so I’m surprised it isn’t more widely known. It has to do with a boat designer and sometime font designer who eventually went to work for the Wright Brothers of Kitty Hawk fame.  And, by the way, Times Roman defies a category; you may find it listed under Old Style or Transitional. 

(to be continued . . .)

<![CDATA[Rudolph and the Social Commentary Artist]]>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:00:10 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/rudolph-and-the-social-commentary-artist Picture
[Posted on the 12th Day of Christmas) Ever wonder where the interesting type came from on those “old” animated TV shows? Case in point: Rudolph the Red-nosed Reindeer. 

Up until the 1960s, it was very common to have an in-house artist do the hand-lettering for opening and closing credits, album covers. posters , and something called lobby cards—which ranged from posters to hand-lettered bios of the cast. If you wanted a hand-lettered look for an advertisement or opening titles, but didn’t have immediate access to a trained lettering artist, you could order what you needed from a photo lettering service. The biggest one was called Photolettering. Its main office was in New York but had locations in larger cities around the country. Beginning in the 1930s, you could order the style you wanted and have it customized to fit a particular space requirement. This was done by using actual hand-drawn alphabets on film strips. The custom fitting was accomplished by an anamorphic lens that could bend, stretch, slant and otherwise distort a headline as it was exposed to photosensitive paper, which yielded effects that we now associate with digital type. 

I have a couple of ancient (okay, They're actually 1960s vintage) Photolettering catalogs and searched for the above “Rudolph” style of lettering. There is an alphabet that matches pretty well: “Viva” Vol.2 p.647. (The Photolettering Library was eventually so large it required 3 volumes) The one-line catalog I use is called an index. The above reference was taken from there. The next image is from a font you can actually download called Island of Misfit Toys. That name has to be a giveaway. It’s based upon the title lettering from the original 1964 TV Special. It’s not really the style I thought it was but fits into the same category of hand lettering popular in the ’50s and ’60s. But its close.

Island of Misfit Toys is a free digital font based on the titles in the Rudolph TV Special
So what’s the actual origin of these letters. Well the image on the right side of the collage at the top of the page is from a book designed by Ben Shahn called “A Partridge in a Pear Tree.” Ben Shahn was what has been classified as a Social Realist or Commentary Artist. He was a Lithuanian immigrant who grew up in New York’s Lower East Side where he was exposed to the poverty of other immigrants living in poverty during the Great Depression. His art reflected this and he expressed it in a variety of Media: photography, painting, drawing, lithography and whatever else he put his hand to. His work and philosophy became so popular that he was asked to lecture at Harvard from 1967-68. His lectures were combined into a book called The Shape of Content, which has been used in many Art Appreciation classes. 

[Incidentally, “A Partridge in a Pear Tree” was first printed in 1949. The one used here was printed in 1967 and has been part of our Christmas traditions since then.]   The actual letter designs bear strong influences from Ben Shahn’s travels in Europe during one summer in the early 1930s. There he was influenced by mediaeval manuscripts, paintings by Giotto and Byzantine iconography, which all show up in his later work. If there is a lesson to be learned from this little excursion through history, it’s that Ecclesiastes was right when he said, “There is nothing new under the sun.”

This is a portion of the "Bayeux Tapestry," depicting William the Conqueror's victory over King Harold at the Battle of Hastings (1066 AD) The original is about 231 feet long and 20 inches high. The lettering here bares a strong resemblance to the later lettering style of Ben Shawn. This is probably because Shawn and his wife vacationed in Europe in the early 1930s and toured museums and monasteries throughout France and Italy taking note of the artifacts on display everywhere. The typeface at the bottom is called “King Harold.” It’s based upon the letters on the Bayeux tapestry and is available for free.

Image of the actual Bayeux tapestry, which is 231 feet long. The lettering at the bottom of it is a free font called "King Harold," based upon the letters from the tapestry.
<![CDATA[Gutenberg’s Press & The First Mass Media Evangelist]]>Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:59:16 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/gutenbergs-press-the-first-mass-media-evangelist
It was around two o’clock in the afternoon on the eve of the Day of All Saints, October 31, 1517, when Martin Luther, hammer in hand, approached the main north door of the Schlosskirche (Castle Church) in Wittenberg. There he nailed up his Ninety-Five Theses protesting the abuse of indulgences in the teaching and practice of the Church of his day. In remembrance of this event, millions of Christians still celebrate this day as the symbolic beginning of the Protestant Reformation. October 31 is not a day for the ghosts and ghouls of Halloween but a time to remember the Reformation, especially what Luther wrote in thesis sixty-two: “The true treasure of the church is the most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God.” 

Until that time, Martin Luther was an obscure Augustinian monk in the backwater university town of Wittenberg. The door of the Castle Church served as the official university bulletin board and was regularly used for exactly the kind of announcement Luther made when he called for a public disputation on the practice of indulgences by the Church.

This is what Gutenberg's original type looked like, as would have been used by Martin Luther.
Luther was actually the first person to make use of “mass media.” Copies of Luther’s theses, which is a fancy older word for argument, were soon distributed by scholars all over Europe. In that day, printing using a press and movable type was a new innovative technique for getting words onto paper. It was begun in Mainz, Germany
by Johannes Gutenberg, barely 65 years earlier (around 1455). Previously, “books” and all other documents such as deeds and contracts were handwritten by scribes. There were no such things as newspapers or magazines. In 1517, the only way to transmit news was by a letter or word of mouth.

A month later, some of Luther’s friends gave his original 95 “arguments” to one of the new local printers in order to have some copies. The original was written in church Latin, but this version had been translated into German. The printer, seeing the value of Luther’s ideas made as many as 50 additional copies to distribute throughout Germany. Within just a few weeks, the unknown Augustinian monk in the small university town had become a household name and was the subject of chatter from Lisbon to Lithuania. Martin Luther was quick to under-stand the potential of the printing press. What he said about turning the Church back to Godly roots and how Christians should behave and comport themselves spread all over Western Europe by means of Luther’s tracts and pamphlets.

Although Martin Luther didn’t realize it at the time when he posted the written form of his objections to Church behavior on the Cathedral door that was actually the beginning of mass communications as a means of spreading your message; and this case it was the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Luther, himself used the new printing technology extensively over the rest of his ministry/mission—until his death in 1546. In addition to his numerous tracts and pamphlets, he translated the Bible from Latin to German, certainly no small task. His sermons and hymns were in such demand that he consented to their printing during his lifetime. It has been recorded that between 1500 and 1530, Luther's works represented one fifth of all materials printed in Germany (!).
<![CDATA[My Ten Top Type Reference Books]]>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 22:46:02 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/my-ten-top-type-reference-books

As mentioned at the end of my last blog, this list represents the ten books I use most frequently and keep near my desk  They are in no particular order except for the first two since they are so big. I have to choose them with care or they may slip out of my hand and fall crashing to the floor

Encyclopaedia of Typefaces: The Standard Typography Reference Guide by Jaspert & Berry, Turner, Johnson,(2009)  
Herman Zapf once said, “The old guys stole all our ideas.” Well, this is a compilation of five centuries of serious ideas that preceded us. If you have anything like an eidetic memory (akin to photographic), here’s the book for you. The original editions of this book were created primarily from metal type samples—many don’t even have full alphabet showings. There was even talk of not updating it after the 1970 edition due to the proliferation of phototype, which was held in such low esteem by “real typographers” that it was thought that an update would dilute what was already out there. I cannot tell you, since I still use my 1970 hardback edition. Unless you want to spend some money, the new ones seem to be only paperback.

Linotype Specimen Catalog 1923 (and/or American Type -or- ATF Specimens of Type 1923; Barnhart Brothers and Spindler Catalog 1895) or similar volumes.
Every typographer should obtain a copy of one of these, if possible. Search around, I think there are some online versions that will give you the flavor of the type. Its real importance is showing the differences in letter deign at different sizes. Online is good but you just can’t beat the originals printed with metal type on paper to help you understand what it was really like and how we got to where we re today. [My Note: I was very disappointed to realize the Garamond we (and most phototype manufacturers) used for phototype was modeled after the 10 point size rather than the really elegant 24 point version.]  

Anatomy of a Typeface, by Alexander Lawson 
This is not about one typeface. It’s a mini-course, a historical overview, if you will, of how we got to where we are now. It's really a great help in understanding type design.

The Elements of Typographic Style, by Robert Bringhurst 
Here’s a great combination of history, design and some old-fashion technology. Mr Bringhurst is a poet and, in a sense, this book is written from a poet’s perspective. It deals with art, history, page design, and some explanations of technology.  

The Complete Manual of Typography, by James Felici (Adobe Press)
Everyone needs a “manual”— a go-to book for rules and terms. This one probably has more than you need by someone who’s been working in the industry for a while.

A History of Graphic Design by Philip Meggs  
I didn’t get around to taking this course until I was in graduate school. By that time I was well established in the field of typography and had a minor in Art History. Yet, i found the course new and refreshing and quite a compliment to what i knew of the history of Typography.  This is the definitive book that accompanies most courses. Even a used copy of this book will be a helpful addition to your library.

Shady Characters by Kieth Houston
Can’t tell a pilcrow from an octothorp? Try this fun read. And much of it is now available on line at:

Letters of Credit by Walter Tracy
The author, himself, spanned the ages of metal type and phototype, carefully explaining how a typeface is designed. You’ll discover that despite all our advances, we have lost a lot in getting to the 21st Century. Although written fairly recently, this one’s out of print but available through used booksellers online. 

Type and Typefaces by Ben Lieberman
A really nice overview of what the author describes as “The Typorama.” Simple to read and understand with plenty of illustrations. Good for beginners and anyone who needs a refresher.

TypeSense by Susan and David Wheeler
The only type design and layout book I keep within reach. Highly recommended by Roger C. Parker, whose books on layout you should also read. This one has basics and good application examples, not only that, but it reads well, too.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

You may notice that there are no design or layout books listed. I have a few that I can put into an addendum. As you work with type, you’ll find yourself using a lot of them, whether online or print versions.

TypeSense, listed above is a good all-around book to use
Another popular one is Ellen Lupton’s Thinking with Type. 
Typographic Design: Form and Communication, by Meggs, Cater, Day, et. al.,
pretty much a standard in the field. Not so much a how-to but a survey displaying work into the 21st Century covering al kinds of different forms and applications, from print to web to motion.

<![CDATA[Type History from a Free Font]]>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:33:23 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/type-history-from-a-free-font
LTC Cloister Old Style
A couple of years ago, I ran into a free version of Cloister Old Style. I was delighted to see the high quality of the font. It was very well rendered. Plus, I was able to download the italic version of the font.
P22 Morris (Golden Type)
A few months later I was conducting a graduate typography seminar class and one of my students had chosen William Morris and the Kelmscott Press for her thesis project. She wanted an appropriate text font to use for her paper. I recommended Cloister Old Style, rather than Morris’s Golden Type, the typeface he designed for his own bookwork. Cloister was more appropriate for continuous reading. She was able to download it for free, but there seemed to be no free italic version. The going rate was $26.95—certainly not an unusual or unreasonable price, unless you happen to be a graduate student. 

If nothing else, this was an ideal teachable moment. Cloister Old Style was a “modernized” version of the Golden type. It, in turn, was Morris’s interpretation of the original Venetian type designed by engraver and printer Nicolas Jenson in Venice around 1470. It wasn’t a slavish copy, for Morris had an ideal he was striving for in his new typographic work. The other fact many designers don’t know is that italic fonts were not designed to compliment Roman counterparts. At that time there was no concept of type families. In fact, originally, there were no Roman counterparts. All those classical books we now venerate were originally set using one font, at one size, even for titles and headings. There was no such thing as bold or even small caps for at least another century and a half. 

The first italics were not even developed for 25 years after Jenson’s first Roman type. The first italic used in a book was designed by Francesco Griffo around 1501. Italics were later popularized by Ludovico Arrighi. Neither designer intended to use these italic letters in conjunction with Roman fonts. They were actually used to conserve space on the printed page. The italic style was based upon the chancery handwriting of the day, and was actually more condensed than a standard Roman font. Those first italics didn’t even contain a cap alphabet. So in that sense, they had to have some design compatibility with the companion capital letters used on the same page.
My grad student never got to use an italic with her project, which, of course, is in keeping with the historical tradition. As for me, the first time I used Cloister, it was for something more contemporary that could aesthetically use an italic. Unfortunately, by that time my laptop had been impounded by our IT Department for required upgrades and—the italic had vanished. I was never able to find a site which offered a free download and the project was not worth investing $26.95, so it was time for a Plan B. 

[Please Note: For some reason, downloads are fragile. Always back them up—especially if they are fonts.]

In this case, my Plan B was an Italic from a font that I did own. I chose Bembo, a Venetian-style type face that shared some historical characteristics with Cloister. 

[Another Note that indicates how we think of font families “today.” I was at my first type conference in the late ’70s when a printer approached me demanding to know why my company didn’t offer ITC Pioneer “Italic.” If you are familiar with this font, you know it’s a blocky, 3-dimensional font, with no curves whatsoever, it’s strictly for display purposes. Had this been a few years later, when digital typesetting was introduced, The user could simply slant the letters. Instead of telling our customer that would be in bad taste, I simply said we licensed designs from ITC (International Typeface Corporation) and only produced fonts from the artwork they provided for us. This only goes to show that people expect a full range of letters with their typefaces now.]

Back to Bembo, as you can see, it bears some similarity Cloister Oldstyle. 
Bembo Italic (TOP) Cloister Italic (BOTTOM)
This was an educated guess on my part. And it should be noted that Morris Benton, the original designer for Cloister had no model to follow, so he followed the scribal writing of that period as a guide, matching it as well as he could to the roman letterforms.
There’s a “post script” (you’ll excuse the expression) to this story. I recently came across another version of the Cloister family done by the Font Bureau, also a highly reputable foundry. 
FB Cloister with Italic
You’ll notice that the lower case letters are squatter and not as light as the LTC version I began with. Here’s my theory: 
Type revivals that come from existing metal type are based upon specific sizes at which the letters were used. The example here was likely from a 10 or 12 point “cutting,” which means the letters were originally designed to be printed at 10 or 12 point sizes. We can tell this by two clues. First, look how far the descending letters (g and j) drop below the baseline of the other letters. This allows the lines of paragraphs to be set closer together without crashing into each other (or touching). Second, I looked in my old Linotype specimen catalog and compared the sample here with the 10 point printed sample. And guess what? The designs are the same. The LTC sample above is really closer in design to the 30 point printed sample. It’s generally lighter in weight and has proportionately longer descenders. So my second test just confirmed what I already suspected.

Next time, I’ll list my top 10 typography books. Um, don’t get your hopes up too much. There’s no particular ranking here. I just grabbed the first ten books from the shelves next to my desk. They’re the ones I use most frequently in my research. There are some that are out of print and others available electronically. 

<![CDATA[Free Fonts: Is there a place to get good ones? Part 2]]>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:48:10 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/free-fonts-is-there-a-place-to-get-good-ones-part-2If I had a lot of discretionary capital, I would spend less time looking for free fonts. Many of us acquire fonts because we like them. If you're in business—freelance or otherwise—you get them for client jobs. And if it's a big type family (such as Helvetica, Gotham, or Univers), you may be able to pass the cost on to the customer, But most of us don’t have what we’d call extra funds. 

So here are places I go for reference and periodic free fonts:

Originally launched by Bitstream, the first digital type manufacturer. MyFonts.com has tons of fonts, usually the big brands and all professional. And usually full price. BUT, they do have periodic sales or free downloads if you get on the mailing list. EX., I just took a survey and qualified for 15 free (professional) fonts. 

The site was bought out by Monotype Typography (a very respected type founder from the days of metal). They provided the original Windows TrueType fonts, so they know about digital type. They have their own site, too, which is specifically for their own type, while the MyFonts.com site has a wider selection from other vendors.  

The other site I have to use is the one that no one likes to admit to:
This is probably one of the biggest and most notorious free fonts sites around. Their offerings include anything and everything but it’s pretty well organized. Beware of fonts that lack a full character set. This might typically include (er, exclude): quotes, apostrophe, hyphen, asterisk and even a proper word space). Nevertheless, these problems are not insurmountable. And you might get just the right “look” for a project.

[EX. I just rejected an offer for a free font from an e-mail list to which I subscribe. It was one of those handwritten scripts that are in vogue right now. Being a bit of a type purist, I never thought I'd have any need for it. But this week, I ran into something that looked very much like it as a logo for a web site. And I said to myself, that's the type of request we'd get from one of our pro bono clients. They'd point to this as an example and ask for something just like it. Well, they haven't asked yet, but it enforces the rule/guideline that there's a purpose for every typeface design.]

If you need a text or “body” font, you would do better trying these sites. They have nice headline and display type, as well, but if your newsletter or brochure is just not making it with the Times, Baskerville, or Helvetica that came with your computer, you should look through the wide selection offered here. Even if they are not all free. All these sites have articles and newsletters, so be prepared to spend some time if you have any interest in Typography. These sites include newsletters, articles, and font identification services.

  • http://www.fontsquirrel.com/
  • http://losttype.com/browse/ (pay what you want; what a concept!)
  • https://www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com/
  • https://www.google.com/fonts (This is where you can find all those familiar typefaces you see on the internet.)
Be on the lookout for unusual historic bargains, such as the Fell Types. These were acquired by an English bishop for the Oxford University Press in the late 17th Century. I had run into them in a type  sample book early in my career but they have only been recently digitized and available now for free at:
   [Word of explanation: The alphabets are antique-looking (i.e., distressed) but very carefully drawn with full character sets including numerals, punctuation, monetary symbols and diacritics for all languages. They available at a few other font sites, such as DaFont.com]

Other foundries:
Obviously, other manufacturers have their own web sites. If nothing else you can get ideas of similar fonts to look for; and they might even have stuff on sale. 
Try Fonts.com, which is another Monotype Imaging showplace, and the FontShop originated by modern type design legend Eric Spiekermann. Again, both places have have lots and lots of helpful information about fonts and type design. 

There are periodic sales from MyFonts.com or Linotype.com on the new revised standards, such as Helvetica Now and Metro, New Trade Gothic, Neue [New] Haas Unica

Coming up: The last part of this article relates a real-life story about how I procured a good quality classic font for free (and how I overcame some of its shortcomings).

<![CDATA[Free Fonts: Is there a place to get good ones? Part 1]]>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:12:51 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/free-fonts-is-there-a-place-to-get-good-onesPart of the answer depends upon your standards. Some years ago, when I was trying to build up my font collection, I discovered that all fonts were not created equal. 

[If you're not feeling especially geeky today, it's OK to skip this history section, but do continue reading Part 2. . .]
The digital type industry was quite new at the time and everyone was an “expert.” Anyone with a few extra dollars could purchase a font creation program and “create” a font that would be readable on a personal computer running the new Macintosh or Windows operating systems. In my original introduction to my online course I mention a music teacher at Columbia University who occupied his commuting time on the train from White Plains to create fonts on his laptop using Fontographer. Some of his fonts are still available for free download today, which gives you an idea of the durability of digital font technology. While his font choices, mostly pirated and auto-traced from existing photofonts, were eye-catching, their integrity left something to be desired. 

He was encouraged in his efforts by one of the new “experts” in the field, whose taste might be called into question. My opinion was that he liked the idea that visually exciting fonts were being added to the mix of new digital fonts. Up to that time, digital type tended to be on the order of the stuff you read in books and magazines. Made for legibility but not particularly flamboyant. 

A discussion of this topic would involve the ability of high quality imaging devices to process digital fonts in general and these cheap fonts in particular. This was a time of developing technology and even using the high-quality professional fonts could not guarantee successful output.

A second issue for later discussion, perhaps, is how long it takes to create a font. How much does the manufacturing process cost? This is determined by the cost of your time. As with most items, the time and cost gradually goes usually down over a period years. When I first began my career, veteran designers from companies such as Linotype told me they planned on at least two years. This was because they had to design for brass matrices used to cast metal letters Very time consuming. Phototype, which is where I started in the industry, might be able to do a font in 4 to 6 months since there was no metal involved and our final product was a film negative. And even this timeline was reduced over the years.

It all changed with digital type. The months could be cut down to days if all you did was scan a printed sample and auto-trace it, which, I suppose, doesn’t say much about the resulting quality.

The bottom line, of course, is the bottom line: There are no production or distribution costs, with these new digital fonts if it's is just being downloaded. 

End of historical background. You may proceed to Part 2 for some font web sites.]]>
<![CDATA[September 16th, 2019]]>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:54:48 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/september-16th-2019Another Typical Example of Free Fonts in Use Picture
Everything has limits and that includes font data. Each individual letter or character is known a glyph. The shape of this glyph is controlled by, um, control points. They also control shape: curves and angles. The common term for today’s digital fonts is vector type—lines and points. here’s part of where quality and design integrity enters the discussion.

You can use the auto-trace feature in a software program to capture the shapes of letters. I’ve done this with many fonts. Sometimes you start with hand-drawn originals using pen and ink(!). The example above may have been done that way. The typical problem that is created by this method is two-fold. First, the auto-trace may create too many independent shapes within the character. This means lots of extra control points for the the layout program to keep track of. The more points, the more information that has to be sent to the printing device. This is where the limits mentioned above come into play. If you exceed those limits, the document will either look “funny” on the screen or not print at all. The other issue that will undoubtedly pop up is design integrity. Auto-tracing that many points will likely yield some “open paths.” With vector fonts, it’s critical that all the paths/outlines defined by the control points must be closed/completed/connected. If they’re not, you’ll experience more unpleasant results.

To give you a little background, this font was actually chosen for use on a display board for my 9-year old grandson for a science fair project. He downloaded it from daFont.com, known for a lot of variety in both styles and quality. As the resident Font Maven, I sometimes wonder if it would be easier being a plumber or a lawyer, but I had a reputation to uphold so I decided I would get this font working properly no matter what. Step one was to open it in Fontographer, which confirmed my suspicions. There were just too many control points on every letter/charcter for the layout software to keep track of.

The quickest solution was to try a global simplify paths command. This removes any extra control points while usually retaining the basic shapes. It worked and the font began to display properly—or as well as it could) considering the initial design. The next step would have been to go through the alphabet one character at a time to check for missing points (which create broken paths). That would have been tedious. I ended up finding a few of the more obvious ones and after regenerating the font file, everything functioned satisfactorily. 

Next time: Sources for free fonts (that work).

<![CDATA[Are “Free Fonts” Worth Anything?]]>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 13:31:42 GMThttp://typographyforeveryone.com/blog/are-free-fonts-worth-anythingThe answer is “Yes” and “No.” It depends upon where you get them. The fonts on your computer are really digital “outline fonts” that began to be used on professional (PostScript®) image-setters in the late 1980s. All digital fonts are like little applications or programs that your computer reads. I have been personally involved in the fonts that you see on your computer since 1991.  The first sets for personal computing were TrueType® fonts produced between 1990 and 1991. They were released with the Windows 3.1 operating system and Apple’s System 7.0. A lot of time and energy went into their development.

Prior to 1991, fonts were not specifically used with personal computers. Type was “set” (or output) using dedicated image-setting devices, usually referred to as typesetters. Each typesetting device required a font designed and manufactured for that particular model of typesetter. The type images (alphabets) up to the 1980s were produced on film or glass negatives through which a beam of light was shot to expose the image onto photo sensitive paper. Some devices used impact technology, similar to typewriters. And there were some early printers that used used ink and dot matrix output, which was a digital format that was actually more crude than a modern cell phone. It’s still used today on cash register receipts.
The fonts that came with your computer are technically free. The development cost is part of what you paid for the operating system. These fonts should be a pretty good quality--probably the best you can get since it makes your system look good if the type behaves properly.

What happens if the type doesn’t behave? Well, lots of things. Outline integrity is the first thing you’ll probably notice. I’ve had a few fonts around since the 1990s and they still work. Pretty robust, huh? How many software programs do you own that are still running after even 5 or 6 years? One reason they’ve lasted is their design integrity. Bad outlines mean that your software will not be able to “read” them properly. Sometimes the font will not print. They can be a real challenge in PDFs. Are there ways avoid this? Maybe not (except  for common sense) but most printing problems have a workaround.

[As an aside, my wife and I used to work on a quarterly church magazine. This was not your typical newsletter printed using an office copier. It was actually a full color production on glossy paper produced by a local printing company. The managing editor was the pastor's wife, who was enamored with free fonts. Every issue we'd have to deal with the eccentricities of the free font-of-the-month. Examples of these problems include bad spacing (letters that crash into each other) and words that didn't show up in the final document file. If we found the error first, that was OK because we would take the time to fix it as best we could. It was worse, and more embarrassing if the printing company found something, and then we'd have to drop everything and try to find a solution ASAP. The problem there is the layout is pretty much finalized at that point. If you make the wrong changes, everything gets thrown out of alignment and the page layout no longer makes any sense--and this can throw off the alignment of all the other pages that follow it. And there's always a lot of pressure to get it done quickly. So, welcome to the world of professional printing. Mr. Printer can stop the job for a few minutes but any longer will tie up the production schedule for the rest of the plant. Moral of the story: Beware of free fonts.]